top of page

The Sacred Choice of Monogamy

  • zariahperkins
  • Feb 13
  • 3 min read

There is no shame in non-monogamy. Let me begin there, clearly and without hesitation.


For some, it is an intentional, ethical, and deeply honest way of loving. When chosen consciously, it is not confusion. It is clarity. It is spoken early. Named directly. Held with responsibility.


And that distinction matters.


Because what I have witnessed, both in my own life and in the lives around me, is that confusion is often mislabeled as freedom. Sometimes what looks like openness is actually fear. Sometimes what sounds like expansion is really protection. Protection from intimacy. Protection from disappointment. Protection from choosing one person and being seen fully in return.


True non-monogamy is clear from the beginning. It is part of the first conversation, not a revelation that appears after feelings have already formed. It does not arrive wrapped in uncertainty. It stands on honesty. And honesty is sacred, no matter the relationship structure.


I believe monogamy is sacred too.


Not because it is morally superior. Not because it is the only way to love. But because it is the way my body, my spirit, and my heart are designed to love.


To me, sex is not casual. It is an energetic exchange. A receiving. A merging of histories, emotions, memories, and unseen imprints.


When you touch someone, you touch more than their skin. You touch the echoes of everyone who has touched them before. You invite their energy into your body, and you offer yours in return.


That is sacred to me. So I have been intentional; months of abstinence, yoni steams, limitless reflection. Listening to my body instead of the noise of the world.


Not out of shame.

Out of reverence.


I have lived both truths: I have experienced non-monogamy in ways that were unclear and unfulfilling. I have also considered what ethical non-monogamy might look like. And still, my body answered the same way each time.


No.


Not from judgment. But, from knowing.


Because I cannot divide emotional intimacy across multiple people without exhausting my spirit. I cannot give my body where my mind and heart are not also rooted. And I cannot feel safe in love where exclusivity is uncertain.


I am romantic by nature. Romance is the language of my life. It is in the way I care for myself. The way I show up for my friends and family and the way I imagine loving a partner.


Softness.

Gentleness.

Thoughtful gifts.

Intentional presence.

Someone once called me a pink princess, and I understood exactly what they meant.


I do not want to possess a partner. I do not want to restrict their freedom. I want something far more powerful than control.


I want to be chosen.

Fully.

Clearly.

Without hesitation.

And only.


Monogamy, when rooted in intention, is not limiting. It is liberating. Because with the right person, devotion expands you instead of shrinking you. Commitment becomes safety, not confinement. Sex becomes exploration, not performance. Love becomes home, not uncertainty.


You do not need outsiders when intimacy is whole. You do not need multiplicity when connection is deep. You do not need options when you have peace.


Expansion, to me, does not look like multiple bodies. It looks like self-respect, self-care, dignity and not losing yourself inside love.


So this is not a judgment.

It is a testimony.


Some people are truly non-monogamous, and they deserve partners who honor that truth. And some of us are truly monogamous, and we deserve the same clarity in return.


The question is not which path is better. The question is whether the choice is rooted in freedom or fear.

In truth or avoidance.

In desire or self-protection.


I know where I stand now.

Not from theory, but from living.

From feeling.

From listening inward instead of outward.


I am clear.

I am ready.

And I am open to the person who meets that clarity with sincerity.

No hidden agenda.

No quiet compromise.

Only truth, intention, and the sacred simplicity of choosing one another.


Fully.

And only.

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating*
bottom of page